THE BELGIAN WAVE 30-31 March 1990 · two F-16s, six locks
a lock is not a sighting; a hoax is not a wave the ghost is a radar track, never a thing seen 970 kt at low level owes a boom nobody heard some altitude readings print below the ground fly the night · read the tape · check the sky
…
…
…
Evidence
fact ⇄ what kind of claim · live
30-31 Mar 1990: two radars, two patrols, two F-16s, 9 attempts, 6 locks
the chronology and the lock log are the BAF's own summary report
REPORTED
970 kt at low level is supersonic at the ground: a boom carpet km wide
ISA + Mach geometry, closed form; the night logged no boom at all
EXACT
150 → 970 kt read as motion: 21.5 g over 2 s, the cited 40 g at ~1.1 s
dv/dt and P = mav on the tape's own endpoints; dt is a dial, not a secret
EXACT
The star field over Ramillies that night, hour by hour
GMST + catalogue + Kepler for Jupiter, machine-checked in the tune script
EXACT
The BAF's own study: angels in an inversion, mirrors, one wingman lock
Gilmard-Salmon 1992; Meessen accepted much of it and added interference
REPORTED
The 3D chase is staging: the mission's real tracks were never published
structure as reported, coordinates invented and labelled; the ghost is a track
MODELLED
Petit-Rechain: confessed in 2011, a polystyrene triangle on threads
and COBEPS's reply, that one faked photo does not delete the witnesses
REPORTED
What ~2,000 reports and 13 gendarmes amount to, once the tape dissolves
the one question this bench refuses to close for you
READING
…1 / 21
…
…
…
Tip: this instrument is built for desktop browsers; phones may crop some panels