← Intro 中文
View
THE FISSURE
Subject
Value
Verdict
THE OSMIUM FINGERPRINT
Fissure eruption vs impact: who spiked the ice?
the sequel to INST-46's one surviving measurement
a 9 km ceiling, and a channel proven in 1783 and 1991
five osmium horizons where one impact should be
no crater on one side; no named vent on the other
pick an eruption · mix the endmembers · read the rows

Evidence
fact ⇄ what kind of claim · live
Pt in GISP2 ice climbs ×100 to 82.2 ppt at 12,822 BP, over ~14 yr
Petaev 2013 · the one line both sides accept
MEASURED
Hekla 1991 wrote a Pt peak into Summit snow, 1,218 km away
Gabrielli 2008 · the channel, caught working, same metal, same site
MEASURED
Hall's Cave: five unradiogenic Os horizons across ~4,000 yr, Os enriched alone
Sun 2020, Table S1 in full · Ir, Ru, Pt, Pd stay crustal
MEASURED
Eight bipolar sulfate events 13,023-12,871 BP; V8 = 2× Okmok, 25 yr pre-onset
Abbott 2021 · synchronised Greenland + Antarctic cores
MEASURED
The Pt spike sits ~48 yr AFTER the Younger Dryas onset
Green 2025 · too late to be the trigger, whoever made it
MEASURED
The chondrite fraction fitting the Os over-predicts Ir ×250
computed here from Sun's table + CI abundances · the deciding row
MODELLED
Same-depth replicates disagree in BOTH camps' key tables; all drawn
171 cm: 0.12 vs 1.48 · PL 8.51 m: 0.51 vs 0.75 · undiscussed
REPORTED
"Volcanic" is a fingerprint, not a culprit: no vent has been named
no tephra shard in the Pt layer · the case stays open
READING
1 / 17