signals/periphery
中文

Index

Cross-Reference

Where the three voices converge, and where they diverge. A tool for assessing whether their stories actually corroborate.

Topic Puthoff Lazar Elizondo Convergence
NHI exists Yes, multiple categories Implied by document drawings Yes, "absolutely not alone" ★★★ Strong
Direct alien sighting No No (only document drawings) No (no direct sighting himself) All 3 confirm: no eyewitness alien
Element 115 / Mc · Yes (canonical) No comment Lazar-only specific
Bismuth-related material Yes (Bi-Mg layered) Indirect (Mc same group as Bi) "Exotic material", unspecified ★★ Moderate
Anti-gravity / metric engineering Yes, theoretical (PV / ZPE) Yes, observed (but "not gravity") Yes, observed (Tic Tac) ★★★ Strong
Trans-medium / underwater "Mt. Zeile UFO base" Yes (Navy retrieval) Yes (Tic Tac, 500-kt USOs) ★★★ Strong
5 observables Yes (codified at TTSA) Implied at S4 Yes (codified at AATIP) ★★★ Strong
Reverse-engineering programs Yes (AAWSAP, ADAM, CRADA) Yes (S4: Galileo/Sidekick/Looking Glass) Implied ★★★ Strong
Nuclear interference Mentioned · Yes, primary concern ★★ Moderate
Compartmentalisation extreme Yes (DIRDs, JWIC) Yes (S4 buddy system) Yes (had to resign) ★★★ Strong
Presidents not briefed Yes · Yes ★★★ Strong
Remote viewing as UAP tool Yes, primary advocate (SRI / Stargate / Mt. Zeile) Not discussed Aware (BAASS used ex-Stargate analysts) ★ Puthoff-primary

Note: this table reflects only what was discussed in the three source videos. A blank cell does not mean the speaker disagrees, it usually means the topic simply wasn't addressed in that video.