When this site gets something wrong, the fix is logged here, in public, with a date. A site that hides its corrections is not more reliable, only quieter about its mistakes.
13 September 2026 (continued)
The shape claims briefing put the number of Release 02 videos flagged as digitally altered at six of fifty-one and built a coincidence argument on that base. A recount from the war.gov catalogue gives eight (PR051, 052, 053, 054, 055, 056, 058 and 072); of the seven shape clips, AARO names a command area for four in Central Command and one in European Command and none for two, and the uploads run from October 2019 to June 2024. The argument was rewritten on eight, with PR055 as the counter-example. The Pacific 2019 briefing said the same wording appears on one Release 04 clip, PR113; it appears on three, PR106 ("reported to AARO"), PR109 and PR113 (naming the UAPTF).
The site said Release 04 was the first batch to include Department of Energy files. Per the catalogue, Release 02 already carried DOE-UAP-D001 to D003; Release 04's D004 and D005 are only the earliest-dated records. The Los Alamos fireball conference briefing, its wiki node and the sources page now say "the earliest-dated Department of Energy record", and the sources page's Release 02 line went from "51 video clips" to the full 64 items.
The CIA Soviet UFO briefing and the CIA USSR 1973 briefing contradicted each other about one document: Release 03's CIA-UAP-011 is Release 02's CIA-UAP-D001 (the Sary Shagan weapons testing range report, FIRK-311/01638-77), and one briefing called its scan illegible while the other said it gave no description. Section 14 of the original is readable: a late-summer-1973 evening, a bright green circular object west of Site 7 at about 70° elevation, widening into concentric circles within 10 to 15 seconds and gone within minutes, without sound. Both briefings now state the republication and describe the section from the document; the "illegible" copy merely has no text layer on pages 2 and 3.
The Craft topic stated several contested claims as fact: that the Princeton's radar "tracked dozens of objects at 80,000 feet, one of which dropped to 50 feet in under a second", that "multiple sensors caught it", and that the Gimbal video shows "an object rotating against a 120-knot wind". Those figures are recollections and testimony: no radar recording from those days has been released, Kevin Day remembers a descent from 28,000 feet to the sea, Elizondo's Imminent gives 80,000 to 50 feet, the one released record is an infrared video, and whether what rotates in Gimbal is the object or the camera that keeps the picture level is read differently by Mick West and by the crew. The passage now attributes each sentence, and the tier sentence says the tier rates the route rather than the claims. The Rendlesham wiki node's "observed a landed craft" is likewise attributed to Penniston's later accounts.
The five observables had four origins on this site: Puthoff and Elizondo "arriving at them separately", TTSA codifying them, AATIP codifying them, and two unsourced years (1988 and 2004). All four now follow Elizondo's own account in Imminent: the AATIP team, with Puthoff among the consultants it kept, reduced the evidence to five performance characteristics, and he has presented them publicly since 2018 as the programme's criteria. The Craft topic, the wiki node, the cross-reference table and the Elizondo dossier were rewritten to match.
Fourteen wiki nodes stated Lazar's and Elizondo's claims as fact: S4 had "Lazar worked here", "confirmed" by 2022 Google Earth imagery; Sport Model and Dennis Mariani carried "independent corroboration" headings; Zeta Reticulans said the Hills' star map "independently pointed" to Zeta Reticuli; AATIP said Elizondo "ran" the programme. Each now names its source: Lazar says; Vendittelli's enhancement shows nine rectangular shapes that independent analysts read as geology or processing artefacts; "echoes and parallels (not independent corroboration)"; Marjorie Fish's reading of a hypnosis-drawn map, contested by astronomers; Elizondo says he ran it and the Department of Defense disputes it. The same wording on the caveats, cross-reference and sources pages was changed too.
The warp energy ledger credited the bill of about 10⁶⁴ kg of negative mass-energy to Alcubierre as his "own" or "first" estimate. Alcubierre's 1994 paper gives the metric and notes that it violates the energy conditions, but prices no total; the more-than-the-universe figure, and the quantum-inequality argument that drives the wall toward the Planck length, are Pfenning and Ford 1997, which the page's own source list already said. Every passage in both languages now credits Pfenning and Ford.
The Raptor and Merlin bench gave Merlin 1D a vacuum thrust of 981 kN, which is the Merlin Vacuum engine's figure, a different nozzle from the sea-level engine the bench models. The sea-level engine's own vacuum thrust, from the 8,227 kN SpaceX lists for the nine-engine first stage, is 914 kN, and the bench and its methods note now carry it. The story's second and third chapters quote 300 bar and 46 MW; they now say those are the full-throttle values, since the panel beside them opens at 82 per cent.
The Quantum Tunnelling bench put the over-barrier resonances at a barrier width of a half-integer number of wavelengths. The condition is an integer number of half-wavelengths, k₂L = nπ; the old wording named only the odd resonances and skipped every even one. The Chinese text was already right.
The Bell Test bench said real experiments land near S ≈ 2.4. That is the 2.42 ± 0.20 of the loophole-free electron-spin test, Hensen et al. 2015, presented as the general case; photon experiments run much higher, 2.697 ± 0.015 for Aspect, Grangier and Roger 1982 and 2.73 ± 0.02 for Weihs et al. 1998. Both languages now say so, and the two photon papers joined the source list.
The Quantum Eraser bench dated the experiment's verdict "since 1982". That year is the Scully and Drühl proposal; the first laboratory quantum eraser was Kwiat, Steinberg and Chiao in 1992. Both languages now date it from 1992, name 1982 as the proposal, and cite the 1992 paper.
The Wormhole bench said the tides fall below 1 g only once the throat is about an astronomical unit wide. By its own law, 2c²/b₀², the threshold is about 10⁸ metres, a hundred thousand kilometres, three orders of magnitude smaller; the energy bill it described as approaching a galaxy's mass is, on the bench's own ladder, between a million and a billion Suns. Corrected in both languages.
The gravitational-wave entry of 12 September, below, said GW170817's real strain is under a tenth of GW150914's. That is the ratio at equal frequency; at the neutron stars' own peak it is about a sixth, and the entry and the bench's panel now say so.
12 September 2026
The Younger Dryas Impact Ledger summary said that ages measured directly on the layer leave four of ten sites touching the claimed window. Against the bench's own site table and Kennett et al. 2015's 95% window, eleven sites carry a direct age and five of them overlap; four of ten is what the precision knob gives once Melrose's ±1,846 years drops off the column. English and Chinese had the two counts swapped. Both now read five of eleven, and both counts are checked by the bench's tune script.
The Chinese introduction to the Westall geometry bench said the Australian file series that would place the balloon was destroyed after 1966. The English page and the bench both say 1996; the digits had been transposed. Corrected.