When this site gets something wrong, the fix is logged here, in public, with a date. A site that hides its corrections is not more reliable, only quieter about its mistakes.
11 September 2026 (continued)
The Future Visions source note quoted AARO's Kona Blue memo as rejecting the programme for "insufficient justification and lack of credible supporting information", and dated the memo December 2024. The memo cites "the adequacy of justification for the program, and sufficiency of information central to the proposal development", carries no date, and was released on 16 April 2024. A sentence the note credited to AARO's 2024 historical report came from the memo. Quotations from that report in the Imminent source note and on the wiki entries for the report and the Legacy Program had also been shortened or reworded. All now match the documents word for word.
The Navy tapes topic page, the Gimbal and GoFast instrument pages and the instruments themselves quoted the Department of Defense's 27 April 2020 statement as releasing the videos "to clear up any misconceptions about whether the footage was real". The statement reads "to clear up any misconceptions by the public on whether or not the footage that has been circulating was real, or whether or not there is more to the videos". Corrected everywhere it appears.
The Earth's Shifting Crust instrument stated comparisons that did not match its own numbers. It called the claimed displacement a million times faster than measured polar motion, where its figures give about 6,700 times. It said the demanded stress exceeds rock strength ten thousand times over, where the ratio is about 14. It gave the kindest setting's shortfall as about 15,000, where it is about 7,700, and it put the point where the stress falls below rock strength at tens of millions of years, where its figures give about 70,000. The underlying calculations were right. The text now uses the computed ratios, and the instrument's checks assert each one.
JAL 1628: The Star Bench said its 30-degree turn time matches the recorded 360-degree turn to the second, and called the turn circle 6.3 miles wide. Bruce Maccabee's chronology of the tape has the aircraft three-quarters of the way round at 17:42:04, 4 minutes 49 seconds after the turn began, which works out to about 6.4 minutes for a full circle and a bank of about 23 to 25 degrees. The 6.3 figure is the radius in nautical miles at a 30-degree bank, about 12.6 across. Corrected.
About, Methodology, the 404 page and the line at the top of every briefing, along with the Release 01 overview, the Apollo 11 briefing and the astronauts topic page, said the briefings link to the original documents. None of them did. Each briefing names where its original is held, in the PURSUE release at war.gov. The wording now says that.
The Evidence Standards page said the simulations carry only three status labels, Established, Theoretical and Phenomenon, while most benches used other labels and also printed T1 to T4 codes that meant something different from the briefings' evidence tiers. The Methodology page said every instrument carries an evidence tier. The benches now show only a status word, and both pages describe them as they are.
The bismuth topic page and several wiki entries presented Charles Buhler's thrust experiments as NASA work, "an active NASA experiment" measuring up to 50 millinewtons at 400 volts. Buhler has told The Debrief the work is in no way affiliated with NASA or the U.S. government; it runs through his own company, Exodus Propulsion Technologies, and the best stacked result he gave that outlet was about 10 millinewtons. On American Alchemy in 2026 he gave about 50 millinewtons with thrusters stacked and about 400 volts as separate statements, and the page had dated that interview 2024. The page also dated To The Stars Academy's purchase of the bismuth samples to 2017; the purchase agreement is dated 15 July 2019. Corrected on the topic page and on the Charles Buhler and related wiki entries.
The Arecibo Message instrument page and the instrument itself called Sir Martin Ryle a past president of the International Astronomical Union. He never held that office. The page's other two titles for him, Astronomer Royal and Nobel laureate, are right. Corrected.
The Astrophage Budget and The Mothership Ledger instrument pages gave the wrong title for the work the Mothership Ledger prices. It is Inio Asano's Dead Dead Demon's Dededede Destruction; the English page called it They Are Already Here, and the Chinese pages used two other wrong titles. Several pages also cited the Mothership Ledger as INST-64; it is INST-59. Corrected.
5 September 2026
The Imminent source note carried three factual misstatements on the day it went live, since corrected. First, it said the site's Tic Tac Kinematics bench "prices the 2004 descent the book quotes"; the bench prices the radar operator's version, 28,000 feet in 0.78 seconds, while the book quotes the 80,000-to-50-foot version, and the two are different reported figures, now stated separately. Second, it attributed the parallax reading to the Gimbal bench; that reading belongs to the GoFast bench, and the Gimbal bench asks whether the object or the camera is rotating. Third, it called the December 1969 termination of Project Blue Book "the one in the Air Force's own record", which overstated the case: the Air Force announced the termination on 17 December 1969 and the project's closure and records transfer are usually dated January 1970, and the note now gives both.
11 June 2026
Wiki pages on Townsend Brown attributed a recollection about a bismuth isotope to "Lewis Whitten", said to have told the American Institute of Physics. Corrected: the physicist is Louis Witten, first researcher hired at Martin's RIAS, and the recollection is from his 17 March 2011 American Institute of Physics oral-history interview.
11 June 2026
The Chinese-language pages rendered physicist Ning Li's name as
21 May 2026
A former Pentagon AATIP director's name appeared in places as "Lue Elizondo". Corrected to "Luis Elizondo". "Lue" is a known shortening of his name, but the site uses the full form for consistency.
21 May 2026
A name was given as "Bueller". Corrected to "Buhler".
21 May 2026
The Mount Zeil wiki page stated the mountain was named after a German botanist, "Friedrich Zeil-Felsen". That namesake was fabricated. Corrected: the page now states Mount Zeil was named in 1872 by the explorer Ernest Giles, drawing on a German aristocratic family name.