signals/periphery
00:00:00
SIGNAL
DOCUMENT BRIEFINGS 04 PURSUE Release 03 T2 PRIMARY DOCUMENT

The first official studies, 1948-1949: how the Army, the Navy and the FBI first handled flying-disc reports.

FILE
004 · first-studies-1948-1949
DATE
2026-06-14
EVIDENCE
T2 · PRIMARY DOCUMENT
AUTHOR
MIKEY
READ
7 MIN

THE DOCUMENTS

This briefing covers three written records from the U.S. Department of War’s PURSUE Release 03, published at war.gov/ufo, cleared 12 June 2026. They are DOW-UAP-D084, a US Army intelligence “Evaluation Study of Phenomenon (Flying Saucers)” dated April 1949; DOW-UAP-D086, a US Navy “Report of Flying Discs” directive dated December 1948; and FBI-UAP-D011, a 1949 FBI correspondence referral built around a citizen’s letter to the Director of the FBI. Together they are among the earliest pieces of official US military and FBI paperwork on flying-disc reports in these releases.

Why this one is worth your time

The first wave of “flying disc” reports in the United States broke in the summer of 1947, and within eighteen months three different arms of the government had each begun to handle it in their own way. These three files catch that early handling on paper: an Army intelligence branch commissioning and circulating a study, the Navy passing along an Air Force request that sightings be reported and investigated, and the FBI receiving a member of the public’s letter and sending it onward. None of the three is a dramatic sighting account. What they show is the machinery of officialdom first meeting the subject: who asked for what, who was told to do what, and where the paper went. This briefing sets out what each document records, and is plain about which of the three survive as legible scans and which do not.

What the documents say

The three files come from three different parts of the government and do three different things. Read together they sketch how the flying-disc question was first absorbed into routine paperwork.

The Army evaluation study (DOW-UAP-D084, 1949). This file is a set of internal routing slips and memoranda from the Plans and Operations Division (P&O) of the Army General Staff, surrounding an intelligence “Evaluation Study of Phenomenon (Flying Saucers)” dated 5 April 1949. The paperwork records that the study was prepared at P&O’s request to determine, in the file’s own framing, whether the various reports on the subject stemmed from natural phenomena or whether their origin could be traced to the activities of a foreign power. A memorandum for record in the file states that the Army’s Intelligence Division (ID) had submitted the study, and that it found, of all cases investigated, no foreign nation implication in the flying saucers. The surrounding slips record the housekeeping around the study: that it was to be circulated and then filed in P&O, that the Public Information Division was to be informed (one slip notes it was, another that it was not), and that a follow-up comment was sent to the Intelligence Division asking it to verify the accuracy of a public statement broadcast by the radio commentator Walter Winchell on 3 April 1949. The study itself, as summarised in these slips, addressed the foreign-power question and recorded a negative finding on it.

The Navy reporting directive (DOW-UAP-D086, 1948). This file is a US Navy directive from the Commandant, Fifth Naval District, at Norfolk, Virginia, dated 13 December 1948, with the subject line “‘Flying Discs’ - Report of”. It quotes and passes along an earlier letter from the Chief of Naval Operations to all Naval District commandants. The directive records that the Director of Intelligence, U.S. Air Force had informed the Navy Department that a cycle of reoccurrence of flying discs was becoming apparent and that the beginning of a new interval was imminent, and that the Air Force had asked for any such sightings to be reported quickly and the phenomena investigated. It instructs all stations to report any sighting of flying discs or other unidentified aerial objects to the nearest Air Force command and to the Naval District Intelligence Office, asks that photographic evidence be obtained whenever possible, and directs that the information be forwarded to the Chief of Naval Intelligence, who would pass it to the Air Force. It is, in short, an order to start reporting, not an account of any particular sighting.

The FBI correspondence referral (FBI-UAP-D011, 1949). This file pairs an incoming citizen letter with the FBI’s response. The letter, dated 31 January 1949, is from a Pacific-Northwest pastor, the Rev. Charles C. Barnes, addressed to “Mr. J. Edgar Hoover”, the Director of the FBI. In it the writer describes something he says he saw the previous May: four beams in the sky passing from the northwest to the southeast and converging against the Cascade mountains, with small clouds forming in the beams and what he calls a great explosion effect where they met, visible for at least ten minutes. He connects it in his own mind to pre-war articles he recalls about radio-beam rainmaking experiments and to recent flooding and unusual weather, and asks whether Hoover can pass the information to the right persons. The Bureau’s filed reply, addressed back to the writer, acknowledges his letter and, by its own wording, refers him elsewhere with respect to the matter he raised. The file records a citizen reporting an aerial observation to the FBI and the Bureau routing it on rather than investigating it.

What the documents do not say

They do not say what anyone saw, and in two of the three cases there is no sighting in the file at all. The Navy directive is an instruction to report; it describes no event. The Army file is paperwork about a study; the study’s underlying cases are not reproduced in it, and what survives here is the routing and a one-line summary of its finding. Only the FBI file contains a first-person account, and that account is a single citizen’s recollection, undated as to the precise day, uncorroborated, and not investigated by the Bureau that received it.

The Army study’s recorded finding is narrow. As summarised in the file, it addressed one question, whether a foreign power lay behind the reports, and recorded a negative answer to that question. The file does not record the study reaching any conclusion about what the objects were, only that it found no foreign-nation involvement.

They are early, partial and, in two cases, badly degraded. DOW-UAP-D084 survives as a faint carbon-copy scan, legible in places and broken in others; DOW-UAP-D086, the Navy file, survives largely as a poor-quality scan whose cover and routing pages are not readable, with one clearly legible directive page. The files are also redacted and stamped with the marks of declassification review. This briefing does not reconstruct text that cannot be read with confidence.

They do not connect to one another in the record. The three documents were created independently by three different organisations and are gathered here because each is early official paper on the same subject, not because they cross-reference each other. None cites the others.

From the record

Evaluation Study of Phenomenon DOW-UAP-D084, the subject line of the Army study (continuing “(Flying Saucers)”)

there was no foreign nation implication in these flying saucers. DOW-UAP-D084, a memorandum for record, summarising the Army study’s finding

“Flying Discs” - Report of DOW-UAP-D086, the subject line of the Navy directive (read from the page image; see notes)

Dear Mr. Hoover: FBI-UAP-D011, the opening of the citizen’s letter to the Director of the FBI

Where the case connects

These three files are the earliest official US handling of flying discs in this series, and they sit upstream of the larger studies that followed. Briefing R3-05 covers the US Air Force’s compiled incident summaries, the running check-list of unidentified-flying-object reports forwarded from Wright Field, which is the Air Force counterpart to the Army study seen here. Briefing R3-13 covers the FBI’s later field-office files from the 1950s and 1960s, where the same pattern visible in FBI-UAP-D011, a citizen reports a sighting and the Bureau logs and refers it rather than investigating, recurs as a routine. Briefing 1 of Release 01 covers PURSUE and the tier system.

The files also leave their own loose ends. The Army study’s underlying case material is not in DOW-UAP-D084, only the routing and a summary of its finding; the comment sent to the Intelligence Division to verify the Walter Winchell broadcast has no recorded answer in this file. The Navy directive generated the reports it asked for, but those reports are not part of DOW-UAP-D086. The FBI reply refers the pastor’s letter onward without naming, in the legible text, where it went. Any later tranche that releases the Army study’s full text, the sighting reports the Navy directive produced, or the onward FBI referral lands in this series when it does.

Read it yourself

DOW-UAP-D084 (“US Army Flying Saucer Study, 1949”), DOW-UAP-D086 (“US Navy Report of Flying Discs, 1948”) and FBI-UAP-D011 (“D/FBI Correspondence Referral, 1949”) are hosted at war.gov in PURSUE Release 03.

Read the files. Decide for yourself.

The wiki entries below give background on the programme and the publisher behind this briefing.

References and further reading

  • Primary document: DOW-UAP-D084, “US Army Flying Saucer Study, 1949”, PURSUE Release 03, U.S. Department of War, hosted at war.gov/ufo
  • Primary document: DOW-UAP-D086, “US Navy Report of Flying Discs, 1948”, PURSUE Release 03, U.S. Department of War, hosted at war.gov/ufo
  • Primary document: FBI-UAP-D011, “D/FBI Correspondence Referral, 1949”, PURSUE Release 03, U.S. Department of War, hosted at war.gov/ufo
  • Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters, U.S. Department of War, war.gov/ufo
  • AARO UAP Records, All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, aaro.mil/UAP-Records
  • Briefing R3-05 in this series, on the US Air Force compiled incident summaries
  • Briefing R3-13 in this series, on the FBI field-office files of the 1950s and 1960s
  • Briefing 1 of Release 01, on PURSUE and the evidence tier system
DOWFBIAAROEARLY STUDIES19481949HISTORICALDISCLOSURE